Charts & Graphs

Good canopy penetration and excellent spray deposition uniformity from the top of the canopy to the bottom results from using the air-assisted electrostatic sprayer. – University of Georgia, USDA

This graph shows the quantity of active ingredient deposited onto broccoli plants. A two-fold improvement in spray deposition was achieved on the inner-canopy leaves using the air-assisted electrostatic sprayer. – University of Georgia

Deposition of Permethrin onto mature chrysanthemums was initially 3.5 times higher using the air-assisted electrostatically charged sprayer compared to a conventional sprayer. The average residual life was over 20% greater. – University of California, Davis

Spray deposited onto strawberry foliage. Trials performed by the University of California and the Strawberry Advisory Board. – University of California, Davis

Fig.1 – Foliar and nontarget deposition from conventional and reduced-volume pesticide application in greenhouses. D. Ken. Giles, T. Craig. Blewett, Steven G. Saiz, Angelica M. Welsh, and Robert I. Krieger. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1992, 40(12), 2510-2516

The University of California completed a series of tests to investigate what happens to spray liquid after it leaves the nozzle. Conclusion: ESS technology places over 4 times the amount of spray onto the plant surface using 1/2 the amount of chemicals. Furthermore, they also reported that ESS sprayers send 2/3 less chemicals to the ground and into the air. Less chemical used overall, less waste and less drift than conventional equipment.


62 Morrison St

Watkinsville GA 30677

Looking for the latest news?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.