Charts & Graphs
Good canopy penetration and excellent spray deposition uniformity from the top of the canopy to the bottom results from using the air-assisted electrostatic sprayer. – University of Georgia, USDA
Deposition of Permethrin onto mature chrysanthemums was initially 3.5 times higher using the air-assisted electrostatically charged sprayer compared to a conventional sprayer. The average residual life was over 20% greater. – University of California, Davis
The University of California completed a series of tests to investigate what happens to spray liquid after it leaves the nozzle. Conclusion: ESS technology places over 4 times the amount of spray onto the plant surface using 1/2 the amount of chemicals. Furthermore, they also reported that ESS sprayers send 2/3 less chemicals to the ground and into the air. Less chemical used overall, less waste and less drift than conventional equipment.